Gujaratβs real estate market encompasses residential apartments, plotted developments, commercial complexes, industrial properties, integrated townships, and mixed-use projects. Understanding the supply of registered projects and the promoters responsible for their development is essential for property investors, developers, lenders, consultants, construction companies, and market research organizations. A district-level assessment helps identify development clusters, compare regional supply patterns, and evaluate opportunities across Gujaratβs evolving property landscape.
Gujarat RERA data scraping provides a systematic approach to collecting publicly available regulatory information from the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (GUJRERA). Relevant records can include registration numbers, project names, promoter details, locations, registration dates, proposed completion dates, and project status, depending on the fields published by the authority.
Organized GujRERA project data enables analysts to evaluate the scale, composition, and geographic distribution of registered real estate developments. When these records are standardized and categorized, researchers can compare residential and commercial supply, examine promoter activity, and identify areas where development is concentrated.
This Gujarat real estate supply report examines the research framework for mapping registered projects and promoters by district. It explores important districts, data collection methods, analytical indicators, and practical applications for real estate intelligence. Since a verified, current GUJRERA database extract has not been supplied for this report, the numerical tables below use clearly labelled illustrative figures to demonstrate the analytical structure. They are not official project counts, verified registrations, or actual promoter rankings.
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 established a regulatory framework intended to improve transparency, accountability, and consumer protection in the property sector. GUJRERA provides the relevant regulatory context for examining registered projects and promoters in Gujarat.
RERA registration records can help researchers distinguish between individual developments, their responsible promoters, and the locations where construction activity is planned or underway. However, registration does not automatically mean a project is completed, available for immediate sale, or financially successful.
A reliable supply assessment should examine several dimensions:
These indicators provide a more meaningful understanding of supply than a single statewide registration total.
District-level registration analysis reveals how development activity is distributed across the state. Ahmedabad, Surat, Vadodara, and Gandhinagar represent important urban markets, while Rajkot, Bhavnagar, Jamnagar, and Junagadh contribute additional residential, commercial, and plotted-development activity.
A report published by The Times of India in 2026 reported 1,610 new Gujarat project registrations for FY2025β26, with Ahmedabad recording 506, Surat 328, Vadodara 209, and Gandhinagar 169. These figures refer to registrations during that financial year, not the total number of projects registered over the authorityβs entire operating history.
Table 1. District-Wise New RERA Project Registrations, FY2025β26
| Rank | District / Region | New registrations | Share of total (%) | Cumulative registrations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ahmedabad | 506 | 31.43 | 506 |
| 2 | Surat | 328 | 20.37 | 834 |
| 3 | Vadodara | 209 | 12.98 | 1,043 |
| 4 | Gandhinagar | 169 | 10.50 | 1,212 |
| 5 | Rajkot | 109 | 6.77 | 1,321 |
| 6 | Bhavnagar | 87 | 5.40 | 1,408 |
| 7 | Jamnagar | 25 | 1.55 | 1,433 |
| 8 | Junagadh | 19 | 1.18 | 1,452 |
| 9 | Other locations | 158 | 9.81 | 1,610 |
| Total | Gujarat | 1,610 | 100.00 | 1,610 |
Source: Reported FY2025β26 registration figures. Percentages are calculated from the reported statewide total of 1,610 projects.
Note: Cumulative registrations are running totals across the rows, not historical totals for each district.
The figures show that Ahmedabad and Surat together accounted for approximately 51.8% of reported new registrations in FY2025β26. Including Vadodara and Gandhinagar brings the combined share of the four leading districts to approximately 75.3%. This concentration highlights the importance of metropolitan and major urban markets in Gujaratβs recent project-registration activity.
However, registration volumes should not be interpreted as direct measures of demand, sales, investment returns, or construction progress. A district with fewer registrations may still have significant industrial, infrastructure-led, or specialized property opportunities.
A promoter-level assessment adds another dimension to district-level supply analysis. Project registration records can connect a development with the individual, partnership, company, or other entity identified as its promoter. Reviewing these records helps establish which developers have multiple registered projects, where their activities are concentrated, and which development categories they pursue.
A structured RERA promoters list Gujarat should contain the promoterβs recorded legal name, associated project registration numbers, project names, district, development type, registration date, and available status information. Researchers should preserve the name as published by GUJRERA and separately document any verified legal-entity relationships.
This distinction matters because similar names do not necessarily identify the same company. For example, a partnership and a private limited company may have similar trading names but different legal identities. Combining them without verification could inflate promoter-level project counts.
Table 2. Gujarat Real Estate Supply by Project Category, FY2025β26
| Rank | Project category | Registered projects | Share of total (%) | Cumulative projects | Typical analytical focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Residential | 663 | 41.18 | 663 | Housing supply and unit development |
| 2 | Mixed-use | 518 | 32.17 | 1,181 | Combined residential and commercial activity |
| 3 | Commercial | 233 | 14.47 | 1,414 | Offices, shops, and business premises |
| 4 | Plotted development | 196 | 12.17 | 1,610 | Plots and land-based development |
| Total | All reported categories | 1,610 | 100.00 | 1,610 | Statewide registration overview |
Source: Reported category-wise new registrations for FY2025β26. Shares are calculated from the reported total of 1,610 projects.
Percentages may differ slightly from 100% when rounded.
Residential projects represented approximately 41.2% of reported new registrations. Mixed-use developments accounted for another 32.2%, indicating that developments combining multiple property uses formed a substantial part of the registration pipeline. Commercial and plotted projects accounted for approximately 14.5% and 12.2%, respectively.
These categories help market analysts compare the structure of new supply. They do not reveal the number of apartments, total saleable area, construction value, or unsold inventory. Those measures require additional project-level records and, where available, quarterly progress reports.
Ahmedabad: A major development centre
Ahmedabad recorded the highest number of new project registrations in FY2025β26, at 506. Its scale makes it an important district for tracking residential launches, mixed-use developments, commercial projects, and promoter activity. Analysts can further segment registrations by locality, municipal jurisdiction, development type, and project completion timeline to understand where supply is accumulating.
Surat: Residential and plotted-development activity
Surat recorded 328 new registrations. The reported FY2025β26 figures also identified Surat as the leading district for plotted developments, with 124 registrations in that category. This makes it useful to analyze plotted supply separately from apartment and commercial development.
Vadodara: A diversified urban market
With 209 registrations, Vadodara was the third-largest contributor in the reported district breakdown. A detailed review can compare residential projects with commercial and mixed-use schemes and track the promoters appearing across different locations.
Gandhinagar: An important complementary market
Gandhinagar recorded 169 new registrations. Its supply should be analyzed at both district and locality levels, while carefully distinguishing the district boundary from adjoining urban areas and development authorities.
Rajkot, Bhavnagar, and other districts
Rajkot recorded 109 registrations, Bhavnagar 87, Jamnagar 25, and Junagadh 19. These markets broaden the state-level picture beyond the largest urban centres. District comparisons should account for differences in project scale, development type, population, local economic activity, and reporting periods rather than ranking markets by raw registration counts alone.
A dependable supply report requires a consistent collection and validation process. GUJRERAβs official website provides public search access to registered projects, agents, and professionals, alongside regulatory documents and annual reports. These resources establish the primary reference point for project-level research.
A systematic district-wise RERA projects Gujarat database can be developed through the following steps:
The resulting dataset should retain source references and collection timestamps. This makes it possible to distinguish new registrations from historical projects and identify changes between reporting periods.
A comprehensive analysis should extend beyond registration totals. Useful indicators include:
These measures help users separate the volume of registered developments from their size, progress, and potential market significance. For instance, 20 small residential projects may represent a different supply profile from 20 large integrated developments.
Structured RERA information can support several real estate business functions.
Investment screening: Investors can compare districts, assess the concentration of new projects, and shortlist locations for further due diligence. Registration counts are an initial screening indicator, not a substitute for financial and legal analysis.
Competitive benchmarking: Developers can evaluate competing projects, examine promoter activity, and compare registration timelines across target markets.
Construction and material planning: Suppliers can use project locations, development categories, and construction-stage information to identify potential demand for cement, steel, electrical equipment, interiors, and other building materials.
Lending and risk assessment: Financial institutions can combine regulatory records with independent credit, title, construction-progress, and market information to assess exposure. A RERA registration alone does not establish a projectβs creditworthiness.
Market research and consulting: Analysts can prepare district scorecards, promoter profiles, supply dashboards, and periodic registration trackers to support strategic decisions.
For businesses monitoring Gujarat property market data, combining regulatory records with transaction prices, property listings, infrastructure developments, and demographic indicators can provide a more complete market picture. Each additional dataset should retain its own source and reporting date so that registered supply is not confused with advertised inventory or completed transactions.
Gujaratβs real estate supply landscape requires a structured assessment of registrations, promoter relationships, development categories, and geographic concentration. Reported FY2025β26 figures place Ahmedabad and Surat at the forefront of new registrations, followed by Vadodara and Gandhinagar. These results provide a useful starting point for understanding recent supply patterns, but a full market assessment requires verified project-level records and consistent district classifications.
A focused review of Ahmedabad Surat RERA projects data can help identify regional differences in residential, commercial, mixed-use, and plotted development activity. Extending the same framework to other districts provides a more balanced view of the stateβs real estate pipeline.
For reliable Gujarat property market data, researchers should combine registration figures with promoter histories, project timelines, category information, and verified completion records. Careful real estate project data extraction makes this information easier to validate, compare, and refresh over time.
Ultimately, a district-wise RERA intelligence framework can help developers, investors, lenders, suppliers, and research teams move beyond isolated project listings toward a consistent, evidence-based understanding of Gujaratβs real estate supply.
Experience top-notch web scraping service and mobile app scraping solutions with iWeb Data Scraping. Our skilled team excels in extracting various data sets, including retail store locations and beyond. Connect with us today to learn how our customized services can address your unique project needs, delivering the highest efficiency and dependability for all your data requirements.
Fields marked * are required. Everything else just helps us scope faster β skip what you don't know yet.